tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1176598188760473397.post573940670960415848..comments2023-12-11T00:34:19.223-08:00Comments on Apollonius of Tyana : How Rome ruled the world long after the Roman Empire failed.BronnyNZhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09560023800644829786noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1176598188760473397.post-60314661208949373292017-06-12T23:36:02.928-07:002017-06-12T23:36:02.928-07:00"A rose (a teaching) by any other name would ..."A rose (a teaching) by any other name would smell as sweet". Indeed...<br /><br />"Greater love has no man than he who would lay down his life for his friend."<br />"Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you."<br />"Love the lord your God with your heart, mind and soul, and love your neighbour as yourself."<br /><br />- Sounds like the words of a Pythagorean philosopher to me...BronnyNZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09560023800644829786noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1176598188760473397.post-22084262699086726582017-06-12T23:26:25.823-07:002017-06-12T23:26:25.823-07:00Please remember, educated people in the 17th centu...Please remember, educated people in the 17th century really loved word play, homophones, double entendre and puns. These are much celebrated in the works of Shakespeare to this day. "Iuliet" therefore stands for "a little Iulius". Please also remember that only men acted in the Western theatre right throughout history up until the end of the 18th century. Even in the 19th century in Britain and all over Europe, a woman who performed on the stage was considered a prostitute. <br /><br />Therefore, "Juliet" was never a female. He is a man. And Romeo is also played by a male, therefore, he also is a man. But legally, we know that all "men" became fictional dead entities in law under Pope Leo in 1305 and in 1666 under the "Cestui Que Vie Act" that was passed in the English parliament on the three days the Great Fire of London raged. Under these laws, all individuals became corpses (corporations) lost at sea after 7 years (of age).<br /><br />For the educated in England coming to see Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet", they might well have seen the significances, even in the title, which when translated becomes: I Rome (a masculine patriarchy) finds itself in bed with the lesser Julius - "Iesus Christus" - who in fact is Apollonius of Tyana - And how is all of this (ruse) eventually going to end? - By Rome and "Iesus" completely nullifying each other out? Perhaps... Also note: The story of Apollonius was well known in Rennaissance Europe and his fame was enjoying a second revival. The knowledge was suppressed again before the 19th century. The well-heeled and well-wigged of London could have been very aware of the secrets held within the words and character names of this play. That's the beauty of Shakespeare: many esoteric references... a very clever man.<br />BronnyNZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09560023800644829786noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1176598188760473397.post-88497422216892380552017-06-12T23:26:05.128-07:002017-06-12T23:26:05.128-07:00It is said that William Shakespeare left us a lot ...It is said that William Shakespeare left us a lot of clues in his works that point to the true nature of things. In his work "Romeo and Juliet" Shakespeare writes: "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This line came to mind as I was proofreading this article, in relation to my commentary, "Just look around you at the number of churches that exist who teach this man's words of Love." It is my belief that the words of love originally were uttered by Apollonius of Tyana - so even if the name of Apollonius got changed on purpose over the passage of time, the words he spoke would still be as sweet. Now let's look at the clue that Shakespeare may have left for us...<br /><br />His characters are named "Romeo" which in Latin means "He is Rome", and "Juliet" can denote a "little" or "feminine" version of Julius Caesar (JC). People have often speculated that Julius Caesar is actually Jesus Christ. I think these speculations are not too far off the mark. Since there is no "J" in Latin, the name "Juliet" in Latin would begin "Iuli-" giving us "Iulia" for the high-born females of the Julian family and "Iulius" for the high-born males of the Julian family. The "et" means "and" in Latin, but homophonically sounds exactly the same as "-ette". This suffix denotes "feminine" and "little, small, diminutive, cute," and so on - a term of endearment. <br /><br />Why are the names of these two characters important? You might have already seen it. I'll explain... Here in Juliet's ("Iuliet's") name is a reference to a sun-son that shone as brightly as Julius Caesar, but with less gold, political significance and worldly authority. It was decided that this lesser "sun" would be called: "Iesus". <br /><br />I'm reminded of various sequences in Shakespeare's play where the sun and moon are referenced by the young lovers. I'm sure we'd find more clues to "Iesus" the sonne (sun in German) of God in those passages also. And since we're exploring the idea that "Iesus" never historically existed, to whom is the reference of this "lesser sun" actually referring? - that would be Apollonius the healer and teacher of most profound wisdoms - the lesser "Iulius Caesar" ... In other words, the spiritual Julius Caesar, a most remarkable Man.<br /><br />BronnyNZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09560023800644829786noreply@blogger.com